A-7) Discrepancies exist between the Item 18 TYP/ data shown for the Flight Plan and that shown for ATS messages. The meeting sought clarification in respect to the use or non-use of commas between aircraft types, noting that the Flight Plan (page 16 of Amendment 1) indicates that

 

TYP/ Type(s) of aircraft, preceded if necessary without a space by number(s) of aircraft and separated
by one space, if ZZZZ is inserted in Item 9.
Example: TYP/2F15 5F5 3B2

whereas, the ATS message (page 30 of Amendment 1) includes commas between aircraft types, as shown below:

 

TYP/ Type(s) of aircraft, preceded if necessary without a space by number(s) of aircraft and separated
by one space, if ZZZZ is inserted in Item 9.
Example: –TYP/2F15, 5F5, 3B2

 

 

The comments are accepted and in the published version the comas from Field Type 18, TYP/ on page 30 will be removed.